Skip to main content

Histocompatibility HLA Table Update 2025

eye iconAt a glance

Current Policy

Histocompatibility laboratories see if a transplant candidate and an organ donor are a good match by checking compatibility of proteins found on the surface of cells. These proteins are known as human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The process of identifying one’s HLA genes is called HLA typing.

The OPTN Histocompatibility policies include tables that help match organ donors and transplant candidates based on their HLA types. These tables are used for kidney, pancreas, and kidney-pancreas transplants. Some tables also list unacceptable antigens (UAs), which are HLA types that a patient’s body would likely reject.

Keeping these tables updated helps improve matching and lowers the risk of transplant rejection.

Supporting presentation

View presentation

Proposed changes

  • The OPTN Histocompatibility Committee reviewed these tables and made two updates:
    • Added p-groups, or protein groups, to the DPB1 HLA unacceptable antigen table to allow for more precise typing options

    • Added a specific HLA type, C*04:09L, to the list of unacceptable antigens. This change reflects a recent update in the International Immunogenetics information system, which reclassified this HLA type as having low expression.

Anticipated impact

  • What it's expected to do
    • Help ensure donor typing stays current with the latest science
    • Improve matching and lower the risk of transplant rejection
  • What it won't do
    • This proposal will not affect Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (CPRA), which is a tool used to figure out how likely it is that a transplant candidate’s body will react badly to organs from most donors. In other words, it helps show how “sensitive” a candidate’s immune system is to donor organs.

Terms to know

  • Alleles: Variations of a gene that can result in different traits in individuals. An individual inherits two alleles for each gene, one from each parent.
  • Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (CPRA): An algorithm used to determine what proportion of deceased donors a potential candidate may be unable to accept organs from due to immunologic incompatibility.
  • Histocompatibility:The examination of HLA in a patient, often referred to as "tissue typing" or "genetic matching”; tissue typing is routinely performed for all donors and transplant candidates to help match the donor with the most suitable recipients to help decrease the likelihood of rejecting the transplanted organ.
  • Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system: A group of proteins that help the immune system distinguish the body's own cells from foreign invaders.
  • International Immunogenetics Information System (IMGT): a trusted international resource that collects and organizes information about different versions of human HLA genes.

Click here to search the OPTN glossary


Read the full proposal (PDF)

Provide feedback

eye iconComments

American Nephrology Nurses Association (ANNA) | 09/24/2025

ANNA agrees. We support updates to improve matching and lower the risk of transplant rejection. 

Region 5 | 09/24/2025

Sentiment: 4 strongly support, 14 support, 8 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose

Comments: This was not discussed during the meeting, but attendees were able to submit comments. One attendee recommended that additional HLA table updates be included. 

Region 10 | 09/24/2025

Sentiment: 5 strongly support, 9 support, 5 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences | 09/23/2025

On page 4 of the OPTN document, first paragraph, line 8-there is discussion of the DPB1 epitopes. Our HLA team would like to note that they use these frequently for the virtual crossmatches when dealing with HLA-DPB1 alleles not present in the reagent bead set. Thus, for us, these remain valuable.

Region 6 | 09/19/2025

Sentiment: 2 strongly support, 5 support, 2 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose

Region 7 | 09/12/2025

Sentiment: 4 strongly support, 9 support, 4 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose

Comments: None

Region 8 | 09/12/2025

Sentiment: 4 strongly support, 11 support, 3 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose

Comments: None

Region 11 | 09/11/2025

Sentiment: 3 strongly support, 15 support, 7 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose

Comments: No comments.

Region 3 | 09/10/2025

Sentiment: 3 strongly support, 6 support, 0 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose

Pilar Leal | 09/08/2025

Strongly Support

Jullie Hoggan | 08/28/2025

Support updates to improve this system.

Neeraj Sinha | 08/28/2025

This comment is submitted in my personal capacity. I support this infrastructure-building proposal, which establishes the necessary framework for future improvements in organ allocation. I hope that advances in rapid, high-resolution donor typing technology will be made and widely adopted, enabling the full realization of this proposal's benefits.

Terri Milton | 08/27/2025

Support

Anonymous | 08/27/2025

Strongly Support

Anonymous | 08/27/2025

Support