Skip to main content

Establish Comprehensive Multi-Organ Allocation Policy

eye iconAt a glance

Background

Some organ donors are able to donate several organs: a heart, lungs, liver, intestine, two kidneys, and a pancreas. Some transplant candidates need multiple organs, like a heart-liver transplant, or a liver-kidney transplant. OPTN Policy says when some organs need to be offered together but does not list a standard order for how organs should be offered to candidates who need different organs. This contributes to limited access to transplant for some single-organ candidates and Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) report having to spend a lot of time determining how to allocate organs from these donors. There has been wide community support for standardizing multi-organ allocation and promoting equity in access for multi-organ and single-organ transplant candidates.

Supporting Media

Presentation

View presentation PDF link

Requested feedback

  • The Committee has developed six multi-organ donor allocation tables to establish consistent allocation of multi-organ combinations
  • The six multi-organ donor allocation tables would account for approximately 96% of deceased multi-organ donors, based on data from July 2021-December 2023
  • The Committee requests the community’s input on the proposed multi-organ donor allocation tables and the proposed order of priority

Anticipated impact

  • What it's expected to do
    • Promote equitable access to transplants among multi-organ and single-organ transplant candidates
    • Promote consistent and efficient allocation across all OPOs
  • What it won't do
    • This request for feedback will not change OPTN Policy at this time
      • The committee will use the feedback received to help them finalize a future policy proposal later this year

Terms to know

  • Multi-organ allocation: offering more than one organ from a deceased donor to the same waitlist candidate.
  • Multi-organ donor allocation plan: a system-generated donor-specific plan to guide the user through the applicable multi-organ allocation table.
  • Multi-organ donor allocation table: a table in OPTN Policy directing the order in which OPOs work through match runs and make offers when a donor has more than one organ available for donation.
  • Match Run: a computerized ranking of transplant candidates based upon donor and candidate medical compatibility and criteria defined in OPTN Policy.

Click here to search the OPTN glossary


Read the full proposal (PDF)

Provide feedback

eye iconComments

Keith Plummer | 02/20/2025

I agree with all points addressed in this proposal and fully support.

OPTN Kidney Transplantation Committee | 02/20/2025

The OPTN Kidney Transplantation Committee (Committee) appreciates the opportunity to comment on this Request for Feedback. The Committee supports changes to multi-organ allocation policies that promote access to transplant for kidney-alone candidates, particularly pediatric kidney candidates and highly sensitized kidney candidates, and for multivisceral candidates, who are typically pediatric candidates. The Committee supports a standardized policy to promote access to transplant for these populations. The Committee is concerned that under current policy, kidneys are typically allocated to kidney multi-organ candidates prior to being offered to kidney-alone candidates, and that multivisceral candidates do not receive offers very often. The Committee recommends that the Ad Hoc Multi-Organ Transplantation Committee consider how virtual crossmatching can be employed to support implementation of the policy proposal under development, since organ procurement organizations are often asked to send blood samples for crossmatch for multi-organ candidates. There is a finite amount of blood that can be sent for sampling from each donor and the time to transport samples and perform physical crossmatches can potentially delay operating room times and/or run up against donor family timing constraints.

Rajdeep Das | 02/14/2025

The proposed multi-organ allocation policy seeks to establish a standardized framework for organ distribution, ensuring fairness and efficiency in the allocation process. It aims to address key challenges such as ambiguous priority rankings, regional disparities in organ procurement, and resource-intensive allocation procedures. It is a significant step forward and by implementing this policy, the organ distribution system can potentially move toward greater equity and operational effectiveness. However, some potential challenges that need to be addressed are: (1) Implementation Complexity: The proposed system requires significant changes to the OPTN Computer System, risking delays and temporary inefficiencies. Potential solution could be: A phased rollout with training for OPOs and transplant programs can ease the transition; (2) Lack of a Unified Match Run: The proposal does not introduce a single match run, which could streamline allocation. Potential solution could be: Future revisions should explore integrating all organs into a standardized match system; (3) Limited Donor Group Inclusion: High KDPI donors and rare organ combinations are not comprehensively addressed. Potential solution could be: Further data analysis should determine if additional allocation tables are needed; (4) Incomplete CPRA Consideration: CPRA’s impact beyond kidney allocation and on pediatric candidates is unclear. Potential solution could be: Expanded CPRA prioritization and adjusted weighting for pediatric patients can ensure fairness and (5) Risk of Organ Non-Utilization: Prioritizing highly sensitized candidates may increase discard rates. Potential solution could be: A contingency plan should allow flexibility when no suitable match is found.

Oyedolamu Olaitan | 02/02/2025

This is a very important and difficult work, kudos to the Ad HOC MOT committee for the hard work. I support the proposals, but would like to add that for the "DBD donors aged 11-17, KDPI 0-34%", if Kidney Classification 6 (pediatric within 250NM) is going to be placed above Pancreas Classification 4 (P or KP within 250NM); it is important to make a provision in the policy to make a kidney available for the simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) recipient in cases where there is no pancreas alone recipient so as to avoid non-utilization of good pancreas. Currently pancreas has high non-utilization rate, which is multifactorial in origin and the Pancreas Committee is working to reduce these, however, the proposal as written is likely to worsen that as most pancreas recipients are SPK, within Classification 4 and mostly utilize pancreas from donors within 250NM. Thanks you for the opportunity to comment.