Skip to main content

Update Data Collection to Align with US Public Health Service Guideline 2020

eye iconAt a glance

Current data collection

In 2020, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) Guideline updated its risk criteria for acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission through organ transplantation. The specific PHS risk criteria that a donor meets may be collected in various text fields in UNetSM or attached to the donor record. Collecting information on risk criteria in open text fields makes it difficult to analyze or identify trends in the data, and also impacts the evaluation of OPTN policy aligning with the 2020 PHS Guideline. The Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) proposes adding fields in DonorNet® and the Deceased Donor Registration (DDR) to better track donor risk criteria for HIV, HBV, and HCV. 

Supporting media

Presentation

View presentation

Proposed changes

  • Additional fields — yes, no, and unknown — will be added to the overall PHS risk questions in DonorNet and the DDR.
  • If an Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) responds “yes” to the overall risk question, the responder will be asked to answer additional risk criteria questions.
  • Two additional fields for pediatric donors will note if the donor was breastfed by a mother with HIV infection or born to a mother with HIV, HBV, or HCV infection.

Anticipated impact

  • What it's expected to do
    • Provide additional data fields for OPOs to enter PHS risk information
    • Allow transplant hospitals to find PHS risk information quickly and easily in DonorNet
    • Allow for better tracking and analysis of donor risk information, including:
      • The connection between candidates declining organs with risk criteria and greater risk of waitlist mortality
      • The connection between risk factors and the risk of transmission, which will help ensure patient safety
      • Identification of any risk criteria that should be removed
  • What it won't do
    • Change the overall risk factor question in DonorNet or the DDR

Themes

  • Data consistency
  • Data analysis
  • Patient safety

Terms to know

  • Deceased Donor Registration Form (DDR): The form submitted by the OPO when reporting a new donor to the OPTN. The form contains information on donor demographics, cause of death, procurement and consent, current clinical measures, medical and social history and organ recovery information.
  • DonorNet®: DonorNet is the component of the UNetSM system that focuses on the registration of deceased donors, organ matching, organ offers and placement.

Click here to search the OPTN glossary

Provide feedback

eye iconComments

Region 1 | 09/24/2021

Region 1 sentiment: 3 Strongly Support, 5 Support, 0 Neutral/Abstain, 0 Oppose, 0 Strongly Oppose. No comments.

American Nephrology Nurses Association (ANNA | 09/23/2021

ANNA supports

Attachment

Region 6 | 09/23/2021

Region 6 sentiment: 6 Strongly Support; 18 Support; 1 Neutral/Abstain; 0 Oppose; 0 Strongly Oppose. No comments.

Region 8 | 09/22/2021

Region 8 sentiment: 12 strongly support, 11 support, 0 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose. Comments: Region 8 supports this proposal.

Transplant Administrators Committee | 09/21/2021

The Transplant Administrators Committee (TAC) appreciates the opportunity to comment on this proposal. TAC finds this proposal to be straightforward and supports its approval and implementation as written.

Region 7 | 09/15/2021

Region 7 sentiment: 7 strongly support, 11 support, 1 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose. No comments.

OPTN Organ Procurement Organizations Committee (OPO) | 09/15/2021

The OPO Committee appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback on the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee’s Data Collection Related to US Public Health Service Guidelines proposal. The Committee supports the effort to collect this data and provides the following comments: A member remarked that the binary increased risk system fails to appropriately account for the fact that some donors are significantly higher risk than others, and the increased risk data could be significantly more meaningful. Another member agreed, adding that this proposal provides significant benefit in adding context to increased risk. The member continued that the OPTN Pediatric Transplantation Committee has discussed this previously, noting that the risk for a donor on hemodialysis is different from a donor with a recent history of intravenous drug use. Once there is more data to correlate to actual outcomes to center declines, it can be analyzed and evaluated. A member advocated that this data collection should be as simple as possible in order to allow OPOs to streamline data entry. Creating check boxes for certain increased factors would allow for simple and quick data entry that eases data burden and improves the donor management and information sharing process. A member noted that most OPOs have the discrete increased risk data, but that DonorNet doesn’t currently have the collection mechanism. The member continued that most donor risk assessment interview (DRAI) interview forms are entered into a system with discrete yes or no responses to donor risk questions. Another member agreed that OPOs have the discrete data and fields, but have no way to share the data other than uploading attachments. The Vice Chair expressed concern that this data now will require additional manual entry of data after already collecting it elsewhere and recommended a way to upload the data directly from the UDRAI. Another member commented that not all electronic medical record (EMR) systems in use by OPOs and transplant hospitals interface with DonorNet, and any such capability would need to be consistent across all platforms. A member added that the standard DRAI doesn’t match the new PHS criteria, which creates inefficiencies. Another member agreed, noting that the addition of timeframes in particular has slowed down the process. Several members expressed support for this data collection, noting that it can provide significant value. There was agreement that as this system is built into UNet, there should be a plan to get this data seamlessly from the EMRs. The Committee expressed support for integration from EMRs and OPO data into DonorNet.

Region 9 | 09/14/2021

Region 9 sentiment:  2 Strongly Support; 5 Support; 2 Neutral/Abstain; 0 Oppose; 0 Strongly Oppose. No comments.

Region 3 | 09/10/2021

Region 3 sentiment: 7 strongly support, 7 support, 1 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose

Region 2 | 09/10/2021

• Region 2 sentiment: 13 Strongly Support, 13 Support, 1 Neutral/Abstain, 0 Oppose, 0 Strongly Oppose • Comments: This was not discussed during the meeting but OPTN representatives were able to submit comments with their sentiment. Although supported by the region, one member asked that the committee revisit the guidelines in regards to testing because it has resulted in financial burdens for many patients. Additionally, another member noted that the committee should review blood volume collection criteria for pediatric patients to ensure that it is safe for pediatric patients.

Region 5 | 08/30/2021

Region 5 sentiment: 12 strongly support, 20 support, 0 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose. Region 5 support the proposal to Update Data Collection to Align with US Public Service Guideline, 2020. One member asked to ensure that any DonorNet changes are reflected in the DDR. Another member commented that the OPO will only need to enter the data one time in DonorNet then UNOS will need to move the data over to the DDR in an effort to reduce redundant OPO data importing.

Region 4 | 08/27/2021

5 strongly support, 7 support, 0 neutral/abstain, 0 oppose, 0 strongly oppose. Region 4 supported this proposal.

Anonymous | 08/17/2021

I believe adding these additional options for answers will help insure a better safety net in this area helping the donor's organs being able to be used for the best recipient.